For this weeks post I am going to compare the Harvester Rhyton from the Minoan culture (page 89 of the text), with the the Palette of Narmer made by the Egyptians (page 52 of the text). I want to start with what these two pieces have in common. Both are relief carvings of human beings set on dark stone. The harvester is in higher relief than Narmer, but both show the figures highlighted by the light against the dark background. These pieces are both art created on objects commonly used by people of the time, one being a vessel for liquid and the other a palette for grinding makeup. They are both connected to ceremonies or rituals important to their respective cultures.
Though similar in some ways, these two pieces are very different from one another. To start, the way that humans are depicted by each culture. As we talked about, the Egyptians had very set conventions for depicting people. The composite pose, the hirearchy of scale and their canon of proportions. All come into use on the Palette of Narmer. Narmer is huge compared to the other figures, he has a profile-front-profile pose to his body, and he is proportioned to the style of the time. On the Harvester however, the people are much more naturalistic, both in the way they are detailed, muscles, hair and clothing, and the way they are posed. It is interesting that this relief or carving is the way Minoans depicted people, not in painting, as the Egyptians are known to have done. Also different is the number of figures fitted onto the Harvester, 27 men that overlap and run all around the vessel is contrasts the space and respect given to the over sized Narmer figure on the palette.
Different also are the scenes depicted in each piece and what they mean to the people of that culture. The Palette of Narmer is a piece of political propaganda set to show his dominance of all Egypt, upper and lower. Also shown is the god Horus helping Narmer do so, telling the people that the gods are in support of his rule. There are images of Narmer's enemies cowardly running away and stacks of decapitated foes as a warning to all those who want to challenge him. The overall feel of the Palette of Narmer is dominance, power, and leadership. This is opposite of the celebration dance shown on the Harvester. There is a sense of joy and movement created by the figures different poses, the way they interact with one another on the vessel and the way they wrap around its curves. Whether it is a celebration of spring planting or fall harvesting, the men on the vessel show their gratitude. Their individuality and lack of formation also helps give the feeling excitement and dance, combined with with the open mouths of many of the men, showing a shared song or chant. It is also suggested that the vessel may have been decorated with gold leaf or paint when it was still in use, this would very much set a different tone from that of Narmer. The feeling of joy and celebration given by the Harvester is almost opposite that of the Palette of Narmer.
There is no doubt these two pieces come from two different parts of the world and two different cultures. At first glance one can find a few simple similarities, but after a longer look the two become very distinct works of art. Very different styles and conventions used by the two peoples. Then, with some knowledge of the history and symbols of the culture the two begin to move even further apart. The Egyptians were not the Minoans, nor the Minoans the Egyptians and it shows through the artwork that the two created.
You have some great insight about these different pieces of art. Your observation that both of these are common in their societies and that they both are associated ceremonies or rituals in their cultures is a great point. I would also point out that the Palette of Narmer is 25 inches tall compared to the Harvester Rhyton which is only 4.5 inches in diameter, quite a bit smaller.
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed your discussion I also really like the comparisons made between the figures in both carvings and how they are depicted. I almost wonder if the societies would be so different or if the depictions change our perceptions of their societies. The Egyptian art being so regimented and the Minoan being more fluid it does make one wonder if they were more like their art or more like each other.
ReplyDeleteI agree that the tone of both pieces are quite different. The human figures on The Harvester Rhyton are very emotionally expressive as compared to the figures on the Palette of Narmer. Little to no emotion is expressed in the faces of the figures on the Palette of Narmer. Symbology, canon of proportions, and hierarchical scale are used to communicate meaning with the viewer. On the Harvester Rhyton we can see the meaning on the people’s faces. This joyful feeling is reinforced by the use of shapes and lines moving around the ryhton. Every image on the rhyton appears to celebrate with the people.
ReplyDeleteI also think these two pieces are very different from one another. And it is obvious they are from different cultures. I agree with the two pieces giving a completely different feel. One of happiness and the other opposite. I feel like it might be power, and fear is what I get from The Palette of Narmer. I would not want to be part of the scene being shown in the Palette.
ReplyDelete